IMTIYAZAHMAD MIR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (IRRIGATION AND FLOOD CONTROL)
WP(C)/2761/2025 · 2025-11-17
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11577 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11577 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 05 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2761/2025 CM(7320/2025) Imtiyaz Ahmad Mir. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Saif Ul Islam Malik, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Jehangir Ahmad Dar, GA.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 17.11.2025
01. After arguing for a while, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondent No. 3-Assistant Commissioner Development Baramulla, to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner before him, within some reasonable timeframe.
02. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Jehangir Ahmad Dar, learned Government Advocate enters appearance on behalf of respondents and is not averse to the disposal of the instant writ petition at this stage or else to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. However, he submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field.
03. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the material on record.
04. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage as an innocuous prayer has been made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and the same is accordingly
disposed of with the direction to the respondent No. 3- Assistant Commissioner Development Baramulla, to accord
consideration and decide the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and the annexures appended thereto, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law. The order of
consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondent No. 3, be forwarded to the petitioner through registered post.
05. Writ petition disposed of along with connected application(s) in the manner as indicated above.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 17.11.2025
“HAMID”