AKBAR ALI AND ORS. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER / CEO LADAKH AUTONOMOUS HILL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, KARGIL AND ORS. (LADAKH CASE)
WP(C)/3062/2022 · 2025-05-05
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11575 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11575 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 32 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 3062/2022 c/w CCP(S) 430/2023, CCP(S) 390/2024 AKBAR ALI AND ORS …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. S. A. Qadiri, Advocate Vs.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER / CEO LADAKH AUTONOMOUS HILL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL KARGIL AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI with Mr. Faizan, CGC and Ms. Bisma, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE
ORDER 05.05.2025 Mr. S. A. Qadiri, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that since the award has been passed in respect of land in question, he may be given liberty to take appropriate steps. If that being the position, instant petition is rendered infructuous and disposed of, as such. However, petitioners are set at liberty to seek legal remedy as may be available to them under law.
CCP(S) 430/2023 In view of the disposal of the writ petition, this contempt petition does not survive and is accordingly, closed.
CCP(S) 390/2024 In view of the award passed, the proceedings in this contempt petition are dropped and contempt closed.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 05.05.2025
“Imtiyaz” Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 07.05.2025 15:06