HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (SS) No. 1804 of 2024 Kamal Singh ...Petitioner Versus Director General, Border Road Organisation and others ...Respondents Present:- Mr. Siddhartha Bankoti, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for the Union of India/respondents through video conferencing. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The petitioner was working as a Junior Engineer (Civil) in BRO/GREF. He tendered his resignation, which was not accepted by the impugned order. Hence, the petition. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner gives a statement that the resignation of the petitioner has been accepted, but the respondents may be directed to relieve him. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the petitioner’s resignation has already been accepted on 13.02.2025 and now the petitioner may do whatever he wants to do. 5. Since it is admitted that the relief as sought by the petitioner has already been availed by him, nothing survives in the writ petition. 6. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 27.02.2025 Avneet/