Sri B.Nageswara Rao, v. AP Transmission Corporation Ltd (APTRANSCO),
WP/10648/2012 · 2025-01-02
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11571 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11571 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010134062012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10648/2012 Between: Sri B.nageswara Rao, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Ap Transmission Corporation Ltd Aptransco and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S RAVINDRANATH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P LAKSHMA REDDY
2. V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL)
3. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR APTRANSCO)
4. K UDAYA SRI The Court made the following:
Order:- No representation for the petitioners today.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that after the bifurcation of the State the respondent No.3 has also bifurcated, that apart the petitioners were also extended the promotion, pending writ petition.
3. This Court vide order dated 20.08.2013 directed the respondents to keep three posts of Assistant Accounts Officers vacant till disposal of the writ petition.
4. Considering the submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents that the petitioners were also promoted subsequently, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Writ Petition.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off and the petitioners shall be treated as promoted from the date when they were extended to the promotion. No Costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 02.01.2025 PNS