RAM SUMIRAN @ SUMIRAN v. CIVIL JUDGE (J.D.) UTRAULA DISTT. BALRAMPUR AND 4 OTHERS
A227/90/2025 · 2025-01-16
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115677 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115677 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2742 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 90 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Sumiran @ Sumiran Respondent :- Civil Judge (J.D.) Utraula Distt. Balrampur And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dilip Kumar Chaudhary Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :-
"(i). To direct the opposite party no. 1 to decide the Civil Suit No. 435 of 2017 filed by the opposite party no. 2, 3 and 4 pending in the Court of opposite party no. 1 (Bam Bahadur and others Vs. Ram Sumiran and another) and opposite party no. 1 is not interested to decide the case of the petitioner pending before him within stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Considering the fact that the suit is pending since 2017, it is directed that the trial court shall endeavour to decide the aforesaid pending suit with all expedition, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the party.
4. The writ petition is finally disposed of, in terms of above. Order Date :- 16.1.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench