Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-2065-2025 Date of Decision:04.03.2025 CHHOTU ALIAS KALA ...Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Virk, Senior DAG, Haryana.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL
, J.
(Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India read with section 482 Cr.P.C praying for the issuance of an appropriate order or direction to the respondents to initiate and consider the case of the petitioner for grant of premature release and to release him prematurely on usual terms and conditions of Govt. Instructions issued time to time in view of Policy dated 13.08.2008 issued by Government of Haryana, Annexure P-2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.4 to look into the matter and decide the same within a time bound manner. Without adverting to the merits of the case and in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is
disposed of with a diection to respondent No.4-the Superintendent of Jail, Central Jail No.1-Hisar, to look into the application-Annexure P-4 in view of the policy dated 13.08.2008 and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. The order passed be communicated to the petitioner as well, within a week thereafter.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 04.03.2025 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2025.03.04 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh