Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1939 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 249 of 2025 Applicant :- Sunita Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Gupta,Shubham Chaurasiya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release her on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 0352 of 2024 under sections 80 and 85 of BNS and section 3/4 DP Act, 1961 P.S.- Sushant Golf City District - Lucknow. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant matter due to ulterior motive. He submits that the applicant is mother-in-law and she alongwith her husband is living separately and this fact has specifically been mentioned in paragraph no. 17 of the bail application. He further submits that death is due to hanging and there is no antemortem injury over the body of the injured. He also submits that the allegation against the applicant for demand of dowry is not supported with any evidence. He further added that the applicant is a women and she has no previous criminal history as is mentioned in paragraph no. 19 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application and she is languishing in jail since 06.10.2024 and she undertakes that in case, she is granted bail, she will not misuse the liberty of the same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Per contra, learned AGA appearing for the State has opposed the contentions aforesaid and submitted that after thorough investigation, it was found that the applicant was involved in committing offence and as such, she is not entitled for any relief. Having heard learned counsels for the parties and after perusal of material placed on record, it transpires that the applicant is languishing in jail since 06.10.2024; the applicant has no previous criminal history as is mentioned in paragraph no. 19 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application; prima facie, there is no cogent piece of evidence against the applicant so as to connect her with the offence coupled with the fact that the applicant has undertaken that in case, she is granted bail, she will not misuse the liberty of same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties, nature of accusation and severity of punishment in case of conviction, nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment and considering larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case of bail. Let the applicant- Sunita involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (1) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, or otherwise during the investigation or trial; (2) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. She shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through her counsel. In case of her absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against her under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code; (3) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.; and (4) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against her, in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the merits of the case. Order Date :- 10.1.2025 Mayank Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench