BHOLE NAWAB and OTHERS v. SMT. NARGIS KHATOON and OTHERS
SAPL/30/2020 · 2025-03-06
Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115589 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115589 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 4 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 30 of 2020 Appellant :- Bhole Nawab And Others Respondent :- Smt. Nargis Khatoon And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Madhulika Yadav,Mir Akhtar Hussain,Rakesh Kr. Pant,Sonia Goswami Counsel for Respondent :- Anoop Vajpayee,Atul Kumar Yadav,Nripendra Mishra Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Ms. Madhulika Yadav, learned counsel for the appellants has sent illness slip for adjournment which is opposed by Shri Anoop Vajpayee, learned counsel for the respondent on the ground that the case is being got adjourned repeatedly, which is apparent from the order sheet. This Court had passed the following order on 06.02.2025 and observed that in case learned counsel for the appellants has any difficulty to appear, she may make alternate arrangement, failing which appropriate order shall be passed by this Court:-
"1. Ms. Madhulika Yadav, learned counsel for the appellants is reported to be ill, which is being opposed by learned counsel for the respondents on the ground that the case is being got repeatedly adjourned by learned counsel for the appellants.
2. A perusal of the order sheet indicates that on the earlier occasions also, the case was being adjourned on the request made on behalf of learned counsel for the appellants.
3. However, in the interest of justice, the case is adjourned today.
4. List in the week commencing 17.02.2025.
5. It is made clear that in case, learned counsel for the appellants face any difficulty to appear on the next date of listing, she may make alternate arrangement, failing which this Court may proceed to hear the case and pass appropriate order even in her absence." In view of above, the case can not be adjourned today. Even otherwise other counsel are also for the appellant, whose names have been printed in the cause list, but there is no request on their behalf. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. ...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Haseen U. Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench