SHIV SHANKER DUBEY v. SHRI BADE LAL MISHRA and 2 ORS.
CAPL/1808/2016 · 2025-03-05
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115586 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115586 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13501 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1808 of 2016 Applicant :- Shiv Shanker Dubey Opposite Party :- Shri Bade Lal Mishra And 2 Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Tung Nath Tiwari,Nagendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Paritosh Shukla,Shailendra Singh Rajawat,Sukh Deo Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Affidavit for further compliance has been filed by the respondent no.8, which is taken on record.
2. The learned counsel for the applicant is disputing the amount determined by the respondent no.8 but has very fairly submitted that the sum of Rs. 13,65,737/- has been received by the applicant. The Writ Court has issued a direction for payment of arrears of salary with the date the applicant was ousted from service after quashing of the dismissal order, without determining any amount for the said period.
3. At this stage learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that except that dispute of determination for all other practical purposes judgement and order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with and the same may be dismissed as infructuous but the liberty may be given to the applicant if he is still aggrieved by the determination of amount, he may avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law.
4. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
5. Notices, if any, are hereby discharged.
6. The applicant is at liberty that if he is still aggrieved by the determination of the amount, he may avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law. Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench