Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11558 (JHR)

MD IRSHAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3379/2025 · 2025-04-25

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025: JHHC:12409 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3379 of 2025 ------ Md. Irshad, aged about 34 years, Son of Md. Gudiya, Resident of Village- Chakulia Muslim Basti, P.O. & P.S.-Chakulia, District-East Singhbhum … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate : M/s. Dr. (Mrs.) Vandana Singh For the State : M/s. Naveen Kr Ganjhu, A.P.P. ----- 02/25.04.2025 Heard the parties 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Potka P.S. Case No. 31 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 607 of 2024, for the offences registered under Section 392 of I.P.C., pending in the Court of Sri Arbind Kumar- III, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur. 3. Bail Application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court vide B.A. No. 8710 of 2024 by order dated 03.10.2024. 4. It is alleged that the petitioner and co-accused persons had hired vehicle of the informant for going to Chakradharpur from Ghatshila. While on the way, when the vehicle reached near Potka, accused persons overpowered the informant, left him on the road and decamped away with the vehicle. 5. It appears that the looted vehicle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. 6. Dr. (Mrs.) Vandana Singh, learned lawyer appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the charge has been framed in this case and the petitioner is in custody since 16.04.2024. 7. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected at this stage. 8. The petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for bail after six months. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Nandini/- Uploaded