Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11555 (JHR)

AZIMUDDIN ANSARI ALLIAS AZIMUDIN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4031/2025 · 2025-06-12

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:15251] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4031 of 2025 Azimuddin Ansari @ Azimudan Ansari, aged about 23 years, son of Sultan Mian, resident of village- Patrol , P.O,. &P.S.- Karmatar, Dist.- Jamtara … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel , Adv. For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl. PP. 02 / 12.06.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.16 of 2025 registered for the offencess punishable under sections 111(2)(ii)/317(2)/318(4)/319(2)/336(3)/338/340(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 B/66C/66D of the Information Technology Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of cybercrime. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-3 of the supplementary affidavit dated 12.06.2025. It is then submitted that there is no money trail and only because six mobile phones along with seven sim cards have been recovered from the petitioner, hence, he has been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.02.2025, as mentioned in paragraph no. 11 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations has already been admitted on bail by this court vide order dated 10.06.2025 passed in BA No. 3705 of 2025 hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara, in connection with connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.16 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-