Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 115529 (ALL)

MANISH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

A482/173/2025 · 2025-01-10

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1787 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 173 of 2025 Applicant :- Manish Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Salman,Ana Fatma,Mukhtar Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application, has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and one personal bond for all five cases from the applicant and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the court below. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in all five cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court below. He says that the applicant is very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant in District Unnao are as follows:- 1. F.I.R/Case Crime no. 0180/2024, U/s 305-A/331 (4)/317 (2) Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita - 2023, Police Station Hasanganj, 2. F.I.R/Case Crime no. 0234/2024, U/s 305/317 (2) Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Police Station Ajgain, 3. F.I.R/Case Crime no. 0181/2024, U/s 380/411 I.P.C, Police Station Ajgain, 4. F.I.R/Case Crime no. 0181/2024, U/s 380/411 I.P.C, Police Station Ajgain, 5. F.I.R/Case Crime no. 0183/2024, U/s 380 I.P.C., Police Station Achalganj, Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. Order Date :- 10.1.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench