ARSALAN ASHIQ GANIE (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER v. CHAIRMAN J AND K BOARD OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND ORS.
WP(C)/2856/2025 · 2025-11-25
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11552 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11552 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 02 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2856/2025 Arsalan Ashiq Ganie (Minor) Through His Father. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mubashir Vikar Rather, Advocate. Vs. Chairman J and K Board of School Education & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Alla Ud Din Ganai, AAG.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 25.11.2025
01. After arguing for a while, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied, if the present writ petition is disposed of at this stage with direction to the respondent No. 1-Chairman, Jammu and Kashmir Board of School Education, Kashmir, Srinagar to treat this writ petition as representation and accord
consideration to the same in accordance with law, within some reasonable timeframe.
02. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Alla Ud Din Ganai, learned Additional Advocate enters appearance on behalf of respondents and is not averse to the disposal of the instant writ petition at this stage or else to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. However, he submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field.
03. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the material on record.
04. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage as an innocuous prayer has been made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and the same is accordingly
disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1- Chairman, Jammu and Kashmir Board of School Education, Kashmir, Srinagar, to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and accord consideration to the same by passing a speaking order within a period of six weeks, from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and the annexures appended thereto, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondent No. 1, be forwarded to the petitioner by registered post.
05. Writ petition disposed of along with connected application in the manner indicated above.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 25.11.2025
“HAMID”