DAINIK BHASKAR CORPORATION LTD v. GURPREET SINGH AND OTHERS
CR/1325/2025 · 2025-03-04
Anil Kshetarpal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115488 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115488 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR-1325-2025 (O&M) -1- 133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-1325-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.03.2025 Dainik Bhaskar Corporation Ltd. ...Petitioner Vs. Gurpreet Singh and others ...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. P.S. Khurana, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kamboj Gurpreet, Advocate Ms. Aseeinder Kaur Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL
, J.
(Oral)
1. The Management has filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to assail the correctness of the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal's order passed while dismissing application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The working journalists filed a claim petition under Section 17(2) of the Working Journalists and other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 for refixation of pay and for recovery of the amount. The petitioner was proceeded against ex parte. Ex parte award was passed by the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Union Territory, Chandigarh on
27.02.2024. The application filed by the petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to set aside ex parte award was dismissed.
2. It is significant to note here that against the main award passed by NEERAJ 2025.03.06 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-1325-2025 (O&M) -2- the Labour Court, a writ is maintainable and Civil Revision is not maintainable. The Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal does not fall within the administrative control of the High Court.
3. Hence, the petitioner, if so advised, may avail the remedy of appeal before the Appellate Court or a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
4. With these observations, the revision petition is disposed of.
5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) 04.03.2025
JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No NEERAJ 2025.03.06 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document