VINDHYA PRASAD v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. ITS SECY. COMMUNICATION AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/195/2025 · 2025-01-16
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115470 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115470 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2643 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 195 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vindhya Prasad Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Its Secy. Communication And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Mishra,Vishwajeet Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. B. Pandey, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Sri Varun Pandey for the respondents.
2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has challenged the orders of dismissal dated 13.2.2003 as well as rejection of his appeal on 7.5.2004 and also rejection of his revision on 22.1.2009.
3. It was submitted that dismissal of the petitioner has been on the basis of of his conviction passed by the competent court.
4. Sri S. B. Pandey, Senior Advocate has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner is a Central Government employee working on the post of Gramin Dak Sewak in Postal Department of Government of India and consequently he has efficacious remedy to raise his grievance before Central Administrative Tribunal.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate petition before Central Administrative Tribunal or any other appropriate authority.
6. In light of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 16.1.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench