Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11547 (UTT)

MUKESH DEVI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1032/2024 · 2025-04-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2815 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1032 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. None present for petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Pramod Tewari and Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brif Holders for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 & 2. 3. Mr. Ravi Kant Mahajan and Ms. Irum Zeba, learned counsel for respondent No.3. 4. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioner has challenged the FIR No.190 of 2024 dated 12.09.2024, for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, registered with P.S. Vasant Vihar, District Dehradun. 5. It is informed by the learned State Counsel that during investigation, the petitioner was exonerated of the offences by the Investigating Officer itself and Mange Ram, who was also named in the aforesaid FIR, has been chargesheeted, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition. 6. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present criminal writ petition is closed. 7. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.04.2025 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55 c78b5f9f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE0644984 83A83D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.04.21 15:37:23 +05'30'