Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11545 (AP)

Audi Suresh Babu v. Sri G Anantha Ramu.

CC/618/2015 · 2025-07-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010133982015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 618 OF 2015 Between: 1. Audi Suresh Babu, S/o Penchalaiah Hindu, aged 43 years, Resident of D.No.8-52-4/1, China Waltair, Visakhapatnam ...Petitioner AND 1. Sri G Anantha Ramu, The Principle Secretary, Govt. Of A.P., Labour, Employment & Training Deptt. & Factories., Secretariat, Hyderabad-22 2. Sri D Vara Prasad, The Commissioner of Labour, Govt. of A.P., Karimka Bhavan, RTC X Roads, Anjaiah Bhavan, Hyderabad. 3. Sri R Srinivasa Rao, The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam. 4. Sri N Subramanyam, The Asst. Commissioner of Labour-II, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam. 5. Mr Peter K Schneeberger, M/s Samudra Software Limited rep by its Executive Director, Door No: 8-3-10, V N Palace Layout, Peda Waltair, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondents: SRINIVAS DOMETI Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR LABOUR (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:G SUDHA 2 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri D. Praveen Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri P. Srinivasulu, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner. 2. Sri D. Praveen Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri P. Srinivasulu, learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that there are no instructions from the Petitioner. Vide Order dated 24.07.2025, this Court has already indicated that no further adjournment will be granted, since this Contempt Case is of the year 2015. 3. In this view of the matter, as the learned Counsel for the Petitioner has no instructions from the Petitioner, this Contempt Case is dismissed for non- prosecution. No Order as to Costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 31.07.2025 JKS 3 75 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 618 OF 2015 31.07.2025 JKS