Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11542 (GAU)

SAMINUL HOQUE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/970/2025 · 2025-06-03

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010089802025 2025:GAU-AS:7355 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/970/2025 SAMINUL HOQUE S/O SOFIZUL HOQUE VILL-LANGI CHOOK P.O. KUWORITOL PS. KALIABOR DIST.NAGAON, ASSAM PIN-78782137 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : DARAK ULLAH, HAZARAT MIRZA ALI,MS N CHATTERJEE Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS B H SHIRIN(INFORMANT),MR. S S S RAHMAN (INFORMANT) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 04.06.2025 1. Heard Mr. Darak Ullah, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. N. Das, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing Page No.# 2/2 for the State of Assam as well as Mr. S.S.S. Rahman, the learned counsel for the informant. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that though the Case Diary was called for, however, charge sheet has been laid bearing charge sheet No. 61/2025 dated 12.05.2025. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, namely, Saminul Hoque, was granted interim bail by this Court, by order dated 30.04.2025, and in pursuant to the directions of this Court, he has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has co-operated in the investigation. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the interim bail granted to the petitioner, by order dated 30.04.2025 by this Court, is hereby made absolute, with a condition that he shall co-operate in the trial. 5. With the above observations, this anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant