IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 255 CRM-M-42311-2020(O&M) Date of Decision: 03.03.2025 GURDIAL SINGH ....Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate & Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.7. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) 1. As per office report, notices issued to respondents no. 4 to 7 have been received back unserved. Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate & Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate have appeared on behalf of respondent no.7. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, none had appeared on his behalf. It is apparent that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the petition. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. ( MANISHA BATRA ) 03.03.2025 JUDGE Deepak Patwal 1. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether reportable Yes/No Deepak Patwal 2025.03.04 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document