Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11534 (UTT)

ARIF v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WPCRL/1035/2024 · 2025-04-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2816 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1035 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Aishwarya Thapliyal, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Pramod Tewari and Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holders for State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 to 3. 3. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioner has challenged the FIR No.215 of 2024 dated 01.06.2024, for the offence punishable under Section 304-B IPC, registered with P.S. Kaliyar Sharif, District Haridwar. 4. It is informed by the learned State Counsel that after investigation, final report has been submitted by the Police on 03.092024 against the petitioner, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and it became infructuous. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.04.2025 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f9f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A83D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.04.21 15:37:44 +05'30'