APHC010133592020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 8042/2020 Between: 1. N.LAKSHMI TIRUPATHAMMA, D/O.SESHAGIRIRAO, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS OCC- GRAMA VOLUNTEER, R/O. PENUGANCHIPROLU VILLAGE ANDMANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DGP OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI. ANDHRAPRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHILAKALAPUDI, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT, 4. THE S H 0 PENUGANCHIPROLU P S, , PENUGANCHIPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT-521190. 5. GINJUPALLI NARASIMHARAO, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O.PENUGANCHIPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4in not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 10-03-2020 sent through R.P.A.D which was received on 12-03-2020 and not registering any FIR against 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. CH VENKAT RAMAN The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “....to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4in not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 10-03- 2020 sent through R.P.A.D which was received on 12-03-2020 and not registering any FIR against 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions would submit that respondent Police enquired into the complaint of the petitioner dated 10.03.2020 sent through registered post with acknowledgement which was received on 12.03.2020. During enquiry, it was revealed that there were civil disputes pending between petitioner and respondent No.5 and that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between them and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 3 In the light of the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No.8042 of 2020 12.09.2025 Mjl /*