Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26041 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17548 of 2017 Petitioner :- Rajni Kant Verma Respondent :- Vijay Kumar Verma Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Chandra Srivastava, Abhinav Prasad, Bireshwar Nath Counsel for Respondent :- Sandeep Kumar Srivastava, Dev Prakash Misra Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the orders passed in the SCC Suit No.3 of 2024 whereby the suit was decreed against the petitioner as well as the revision which was also decided against the petitioner in the year 2017. 3. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had initiated proceedings under section 30 of the U.P. Act no.13 of 1972. Subsequently, the property was sold to the respondent who initiated proceedings for eviction. Both the courts below have decreed the suit against the petitioner. The revisional court has recorded that the relationship of the landlord and tenant was denied by the petitioner on which extensive finding of fact have been recorded warranting no interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. The petition lacks merit and is dismissed. 5. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial court for execution in accordance with law. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench