Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 115310 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD. SAMIULLAH @ SAMI ULLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTT. MAGISTRATE SULTANPUR AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/182/2025 · 2025-01-10

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 182 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad. Samiullah @ Sami Ulla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Sultanpur And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Afaq Zaki Khan,Mohammad Asad Mahmood,Ruheen Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Virendra Mishra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner claims that the land in front of his house is owned by him and the opposite party no. 3 is constructing a road. However, on being asked to demonstrate as to what is the basis for the claim that the said land belongs to the petitioner, there is no such proof. This cannot be decided under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner may avail other remedy, especially as, it has been informed by the counsel for opposite party no. 3 that the road has already been constructed. 3. The petition is disposed of accordingly. [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 10.1.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench