SYED MUSHEER AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
A227/62/2025 · 2025-01-10
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1790 Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 62 of 2025 Petitioner :- Syed Musheer Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Singh,Kartikeya Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the Gaon Sabha. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently he could not implead the two other co-appellants in the instant petition and he prays for leave of this Court to permit him to implead the said parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the remaining parties, who were the co-appellants with the petitioners herein during the course of the day. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Second Appeal No.2406/2022, under Section 331(4) of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 pending before the respondent No.2. It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the aforesaid second appeal has not yet been decided. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending aforesaid second appeal most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting
any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the second appeal of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 10.1.2025 Rakesh/- Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench