Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2045 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 251 of 2025 Applicant :- Vikas Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Singh,Arvind Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.435 of 2023, under sections 323, 504, 304/34 and 506 IPC, P.S.- Inayat Nagar, District- Ayodhya. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant matter due to ulterior motive. He submits that the allegation against the applicant including the other co-accused persons are general in nature as it has been alleged that the applicant including the other co-accused persons had beaten the deceased and his son. He further he submits that in fact the deceased and his son were boozers and they themselves fight with each other and received injuries while there was some civil dispute between the parties and therefore after about 9 days of the alleged incident, the FIR is lodged and the applicant is named in the FIR. He next submits that the investigating officer had also taken the affidavits of the villagers and has recorded that the behaviour of the deceased and injured were such that no accused persons were visiting their house. It has also been noted that the villagers had stated that the accused persons were never visited the house of the deceased on the date of incident and they have been falsely implicated. He next added that the delay in lodging the FIR has not been explained and further submits that the applicant is cooperative in the investigation proceedings and there is no requirement of any custodial intervention. He next submits that the applicant is a law abiding citizen and a case criminal history of the applicant has been explained in the bail application. He further submits that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 18.11.2024 and he undertakes that in case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of the same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Per contra, learned AGA appearing for the State has opposed the contentions aforesaid and submitted that after thorough investigation, it was found that the applicant was involved in committing offence and as such, he is not entitled for any relief. 5. Having heard learned counsels for the parties and after perusal of material placed on record, it transpires that there is delay in filing/ lodging the FIR which has not been explained; the allegations against the present applicant are general in nature; the present applicant is languishing in jail since 18.11.2024; prima facie, there is no cogent piece of evidence against the applicant so as to connect him with the offence coupled with the fact that the applicant has undertaken that in case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 6. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties, nature of accusation and severity of punishment in case of conviction, nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment and considering larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case of bail. 7. Let the applicant- Vikas Singh involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (1) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, or otherwise during the investigation or trial; (2) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. He shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code; (3) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.; and (4) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. 8. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. 9. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the merits of the case. [Shree Prakash Singh,J.] Order Date :- 10.1.2025 Mohd. Sharif/KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench