Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11525 (ALL)

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT OF SETH RAM RISHIDAS PARASURAMPURIYA NATIONAL INTERMEDIATE COLLEGE HANDIA A v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/1839/2025 · 2025-07-06

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:106531 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1839 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Of Seth Ram Rishidas Parasurampuriya National Intermediate College Handia And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avijit Saxena,Divendu Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. Sri Divendu Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State agree that the present matter is covered by the judgment and order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Committee of Management Sri Chhotu Ram Kishan Kanya Inter College Duhai Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others, decided on 8.1.2025, and the present writ petition be decided in terms thereof. 2. The judgment and order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Committee of Management Sri Chhotu Ram Kishan Kanya Inter College Duhai Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others, decided on 8.1.2025, is quoted hereinbelow:- "1. Heard Sri Avijit Saxena, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State at length. 2. Case of petitioner is that Committee of Management is aggrieved by Government Order dated 28.10.2022 issued by Special Secretary, Government of U.P. whereby a Committee has been constituted for engaging manpower through outsourcing essentially on a ground that none of their representative, even the Principal of institution is not a Member of Committee being an appointing authority in view of relevant provisions. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that similar writ petitions are being filed by other institutions also and fairly submits that grievance of institution will be considered and if a Member from the College be included in the Committee. 4. I have considered above submissions and taken note that impugned Government Order is passed in pursuance of a Policy, therefore, if Principal of institution is included in the Committee, no one will be prejudiced. 5. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that concerned State respondents will take an appropriate decision to include Principal or its nominee of the concerned institution in the Committee for purpose of engaging manpower from outsourcing. 6. So far as other Government Order dated 21.11.2022 is concerned which is in regard to number of workers to be employed in an Institute, the concerned State respondents may also revisit the same after taking note of specific requirement of each Institution." 3. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the directions and observations issued by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Committee of Management Sri Chhotu Ram Kishan Kanya Inter College Duhai Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others, decided on 8.1.2025. However, the petitioners are set at liberty to prefer representation in terms of the present order before the respondent no. 1 and in the event any such representation is filed within a period of thirty days from today, the same would be considered by respondent no. 1 within a period of two months thereafter. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 S.K.S. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad