ABDUL HAMID KHAN v. PANDURANG K. POLE AND ANR. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/66/2022 · 2025-11-24
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11522 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11522 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 21 Reg. List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 66/2022 in[WP(C) 478/2021 c/w
WP(C) 478/2021 ABDUL HAMID KHAN ….. Applicant/Petitioner(s) Through: -
None.
V/s PANDURANG K. POLE AND ANR
….. Respondent(s) Through:-
None. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
(ORDER)
24.11.2025. Petitioner is continuously absent today on 4th consecutive date of hearing which is sufficient to indicate that he is not interested in prosecution of the contempt as also the connected writ petition. As such, proceedings in contempt petition are closed and the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any, subsisting as on date shall also stand vacated.
(Rajesh Sekhri) Judge
SRINAGAR
24.11.2025.
“Abdul Rashid”