Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 115214 (ALL)

MRIDUL KUMARI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THR PRIN. SEC. ADD. S.ENERGY AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/2254/2004 · 2025-04-09

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20149 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2254 of 2004 Petitioner :- Mridul Kumari And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thr Prin. Sec. Add. S.Energy And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- O.P. Srivastava,Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,N C Mehrotra,Nishant Shukla Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition. However, learned Standing Counsel is present. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2004 and since then it has remained pending. It appears that petitioners have lost his interest to pursue his case. 4. Sri Nishant Shukla, learned counsel for opposite parties no.2 and 3 submits that issue involved in this writ petition has been decided by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.397 (SS) of 2004. He further submits that in view of the aforesaid order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, nothing survives in the present writ petition. Apart from it, there is no interim order operating in favour of the petitioners. 5. Since it is a matter of selection and in view of the order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, this writ petition has lost its efficacy. It is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 9.4.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench