AMIT KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. EDUCATION BASIC LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/143/2025 · 2025-01-09
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115147 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115147 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1587 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 143 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Education Basic Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard.
2. Under challenge is the suspension order dated 11.11.2024, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition.
3. At the very outset, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.3, 4 and 5, states that a charge sheet dated 25.11.2024 has already been issued. Copy of the said charge sheet has also been handed over to the petitioner today itself in the Court. He further states that the department is in the process of issuing a supplementary charge sheet to the petitioner.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that directions be issued to the respondents to conclude the disciplinary proceedings within a specified time.
5. Accordingly, taking into consideration the aforesaid fact, it is provided that respondents shall proceed to issue a supplementary charge sheet to the petitioner within two weeks from today. On receipt of the supplementary charge sheet, the petitioner shall submit his reply within next two weeks. After submission of the reply, the respondents shall finalize the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner and the disciplinary authority shall proceed to pass a final order within a further period of three months.
6. Needless to mention that the petitioner shall cooperate with the inquiry proceedings and he shall also be given due opportunity of hearing in the said inquiry proceedings. In case the petitioner does not cooperate, the Inquiry Officer would be
at liberty to inform the petitioner in writing about his non- cooperation and the period of non-cooperation would be excluded from the aforesaid period.
7. It is also provided that in case the disciplinary proceedings are not concluded within the specified time then it would be open for the petitioner to approach this Court again.
8. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is finally
disposed of.
Order Date :- 9.1.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench