RAMRATAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/157/2025 · 2025-01-20
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115145 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115145 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3400-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 157 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramratan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. This is a backlog fresh. Counsel for the petitioner is not present. The petitioner was earlier granted lease in respect of the land declared surplus under the Ceiling Act. However, subsequently in the writ proceedings it has to restore to the erstwhile owner. Therefore, the petitioner was ousted. Now the petitioner claims allotment of another land on lease thereof. These are matters to be considered by the competent authority under the revenue statute, who may do the needful. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 20.1.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench