VIKRANT PAWAR AND 7 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH THE SECY. APPOINTEMT AND PERSONEL
WRIA/2000168/2004 · 2025-02-27
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115078 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115078 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11871 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2000168 of 2004 Petitioner :- Vikrant Pawar And 7 Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through The Secy. Appointemt And Personel Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Dixit,G.D. Saran,Piyush Dixit,Utkarsh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D K Srivastava,Prabhu Ranjan Tripathi,Smt.T.Somvanshi Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard Shri Utkarsh Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Shri Prabhu Ranjan Triptahi, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 and 3.
Learned counsel for the parties fairly states that after filing of writ petition per which they had approached this Court for being appointed on the post of Assistant Law Officer, Assistant Regional Manager (Operation) and Assistant Engineer respectively in pursuance of select list declared on 22.8.2003 and 23.08.2003, all the petitioners have been appointed and have subsequently been promoted and thus nothing further survives in the writ petition. At this stage, it is stated that it is indicated in the appointment
order that the same were issued subject to final decision of the writ court. As nothing further survives on account of the petitioners having been appointed and promoted as stated by learned counsel for the parties jointly, consequently the writ petition stands consigned to record.
Order Date :- 27.2.2025 J. K. Dinkar Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench