Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11507 (CHH)

SMT. REETA GHOSHAL v. RANJEET MANDAL

MCC/228/2025 · 2025-03-05

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:10653 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 228 of 2025 • Smt. Reeta Ghoshal, W/o Samarnath Ghoshal, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Village Subhash Nagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, Police Station And Post Office Ambikapur, District Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh (Plaintiff). ... Appellant/Applicant versus 1. Ranjeet Mandal, S/o Late Baburam Mandal, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Subhash Nagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, Police Station And Post Office Ambikapur, District Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 2. Rajendra Prasad Sahu, S/o Late Beni Prasad Sahu, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Hospital Road, Ambikapur, Police Station And Post Office Ambikapur District Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 3. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 4. Dinesh Agrawal, S/o Balkishan Agrawal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Barejpara, Ambikapur, Police Station And Post Office Ambikapur, District Surguja (Ambikapur) Chhattisgarh (Defendants No. 1 To 3). ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Appellants/Applicants : Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate. For State/Respondent No.3 : Ms. Mandavi Bhardwaj, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 05/03/2025 1. Heard on M.C.C., application for restoration of FA No.24/2020, which was dismissed vide common order dated 18.02.2025 for want of prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that on 18.02.2025, counsel appearing for the applicant was engaged before another Bench, thus, he DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA 2 could not appear when the case was taken up for hearing, therefore, the same was dismissed for want of prosecution. Hence, the said mistake was bonafide and the applicant want to contest the case on merits, thus the instant MCC may be allowed. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, which is well supported by an affidavit, instant MCC is hereby allowed. 4. Registry is directed to restore FA No.24/2020 {Smt. Reeta Ghoshal Versus Ranjeet Mandal & Others} in its original number. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge