IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 129 JAGSIR SINGH STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Mr. Charanjit Bakshi, APP. U.T., Chandigarh (through video conference) MANISHA BATRA 1. The instant petition has been filed by aside the order dated 13.12.2024 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh in case arising out of FIR No.205 dated 02.08.2014 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120 Station Sector- were forfeited to the State due to and non-bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against 13.03.2025. 2. It is submitted by learned petitioners were very much present outside the Court room on that day and due to heavy rush, they could not appear before the learned Judge when their case is being called. proceedings before the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: JAGSIR SINGH @ JAGGI AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Advocate for the Mr. Charanjit Bakshi, APP. U.T., Chandigarh (through video conference). **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The instant petition has been filed by aside the order dated 13.12.2024 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh in case arising out of FIR No.205 dated 02.08.2014 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120 -36, Chandigarh whereby their were forfeited to the State due to their non-appearance on that particular date bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner petitioners were very much present outside the Court room on that day and due to heavy rush, they could not appear before the learned Judge when their case is being called. Their absence was not intentional. proceedings before the learned Appellate Court and to abide by the terms and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.9262 of 2025 Date of decision: 18.02.2025 AND ANOTHER …. Petitioners …. Respondent MANISHA BATRA Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Charanjit Bakshi, APP. U.T., Chandigarh The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for setting aside the order dated 13.12.2024 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh in case arising out of FIR No.205 dated 02.08.2014 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC, at Police bail was cancelled and bonds appearance on that particular date bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against them for counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners were very much present outside the Court room on that day and due to heavy rush, they could not appear before the learned Judge when their case absence was not intentional. They are ready to join the Court and to abide by the terms and for setting aside the order dated 13.12.2024 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh in case arising out of FIR No.205 dated B of IPC, at Police bail was cancelled and bonds appearance on that particular date for both the petitioners were very much present outside the Court room on that day and due to heavy rush, they could not appear before the learned Judge when their case ready to join the Court and to abide by the terms and Jyoti 2025.02.19 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M No.9262 of 2025 conditions to be imposed upon allowing the present petition. 3. Though, no justification has been made out for sett impugned orders as no illegality seems to have been committed by learned Appellate Court while passing the same, however, in view of the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner more opportunity to surrender before the view the fact that of detaining them aim is to ensure the present petition is disposed of with before the learned ordered that on Appellate Court as surety bonds to its satisfaction. However, this petition shall be deemed to be dismissed if the petitioner Petition stands disposed of. A copy of this order be sent to the 18.02.2025 Jyoti-IV M No.9262 of 2025 conditions to be imposed upon them, therefore, prayer has been made for allowing the present petition. Though, no justification has been made out for sett impugned orders as no illegality seems to have been committed by learned Court while passing the same, however, in view of the request made by learned counsel for the petitioners at this stage to grant the petitioner tunity to surrender before the Appellate view the fact that the absence of the petitioners does not attract the consequences them into custody as they are willing to join the trial and is to ensure timely disposal of the cases before the learned he present petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner before the learned Appellate Court on or before ordered that on their surrender and on moving appropriate application, the Court admit them to bail subject to their as surety bonds to its satisfaction. However, this petition shall be deemed to be dismissed if the petitioners do not abide by this order. Petition stands disposed of. A copy of this order be sent to the (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No M No.9262 of 2025 -2- , therefore, prayer has been made for Though, no justification has been made out for setting aside the impugned orders as no illegality seems to have been committed by learned Court while passing the same, however, in view of the request made at this stage to grant the petitioners one Appellate Court and further keeping in does not attract the consequences willing to join the trial and the ultimate timely disposal of the cases before the learned Appellate Court, direction to the petitioners to surrender on or before 13.03.2025 and it is further surrender and on moving appropriate application, the learned their furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to its satisfaction. However, this petition shall be deemed to be not abide by this order. A copy of this order be sent to the learned Appellate Court. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No , therefore, prayer has been made for ing aside the impugned orders as no illegality seems to have been committed by learned Court while passing the same, however, in view of the request made one and further keeping in does not attract the consequences the ultimate Court, to surrender is further learned furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to its satisfaction. However, this petition shall be deemed to be Jyoti 2025.02.19 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document