Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 115012 (PNJ)

AMIT RAO v. TARIF

CR/805/2017 · 2025-02-18

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (109) CR-805-2017(O&M) Date of decision:- 18.02.2025 Amit Rao …Petitioner Versus Tarif ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: None for the petitioner. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1. On 22.02.2017, this Court passed the following order:- "Learned counsel prays for some time to place on record certain documents. Prayer is accepted. Learned counsel may address on the question of maintainability of the revision petition against the final order passed by the authority under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Be listed as and when appropriate application is moved.” 2. Despite lapse of five years, petitioner has not filed any application and there is no representation on his behalf. 3. It seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 4. Dismissed for default in prosecution. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 18.02.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.02.19 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.