Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11501 (GAU)

MD RAFIQUL ISLAM @ ROFIQUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Bail Appln./1335/2025 · 2025-05-18

Manash Ranjan Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010088892025 2025:GAU-AS:6228 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1335/2025 MD RAFIQUL ISLAM @ ROFIQUL ISLAM S/O- TAJUR UDDIN, R/O- KACHARI GAON, VTC, GAGALMARI, P.O.- GAGALMARI, P.S-MORIGAON, DIST.-MORIGAON. ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM 2:MUSSTT. SUFIYA KHATUN W/O- MD. ABDUL REZZAK R/O- DHUBANGKHAITY P.S-LAHORIGHAT DIST.- MORIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K SARMA, S. HAZARIKA,MS R SAHIN,MS. B BHUYAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, H G DAISY (R-2),MR. J AHMED(R-2),R BEGUM(R- 2),MS A HUSSAIN(R-2) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK ORDER 19.05.2025 Heard Ms. R Sahin, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. Also heard Mr. J Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/informant of the case. 2. During the deliberation of the matter, Mr. B Sharma, learned APP, Assam, on instruction, has submitted that police on completion of the investigation of the case submitted charge- sheet in Laharighat Police Station Case No. 37/2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 241/2025 on 31.03.2025 vide Charge-Sheet No. 55/2025. 3. At this stage, Ms. R Sahin, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, is not pressing this bail application and has submitted that the petitioner shall approach the appropriate forum for his regular bail. 4. In view of the above, this bail application, being not pressed, stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant