APHC010133602020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] SATURDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8054/2020 Between: 1. BODAPATI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO AGE- 45 YEARA, MALE, HINDU, CULTIVATION R/O I.S.RAGHAVAPURAM, DWARAKATIRUMALA MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PARDESH. 2. BODAPATI SAMUEL,, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGE- 56 YEARA, MALE, HINDU, CULTIVATION, RIO I.S.RAGHAVAPURAM, DWARAKATIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PARDESH. 3. BODAPATI ISRAEL, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO AGE- 50 YEARA, MALE, HINDU, CULTIVATION R/O 1.S.RAGHAVAPURAM, DWARAKATIRUMALA MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PARDESH. 4. BODAPATI RAJU,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGE- 48 YEARA, MALE, HINDU, CULTIVATION, R/O I.S.RAGHAVAPURAM, DWARAKATIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PARDESH. 5. BODAPATI SUBBA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGE- 40 YEARA, MALE, HINDU, CULTIVATION, R/O I.S.RAGHAVAPURAM, DWARAKATIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PARDESH. 6. BODAPATI SOMAIAH,, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGE- 40YEARA, MALE, HINDU, CULTIVATION, R/O I.S.RAGHAVAPURAM, DWARAKATIRUMALA MANDAL. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.8054 of 2020 ANDHRA PARDESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRATARY, (DEPOTMENT OF REVENUE) AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU - 534 002. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, DWARAKA TIRUMALA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V VIJAYA VARDHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.8054 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Mr. Kashapogu Suresh, the learned counsel representing Mr. V. Vijaya Vardhan, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no cause survives in this writ petition. 2. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 30.08.2025 PGT