IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62416 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-1999 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Tuntun Yadav @ Ramkeshwar Yadav S/o Yogi Yadav @ Jogi Yadav R/o vill - Asurain, Lutua, P.S.- Lutua, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 01/2025 / 272 of 2025 arising out of Raushanganj (Bankey Bazar) P.S. Case No. 18/1999 dated 30.04.1999 registered for the offences punishable u/s 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant Moazzum Ali Khan, Walfullan Khan, Murtaza Mian, Zafar Alam, Doman Khan along with 4-5 villagers was on patrolling. The petitioner and the co-accused persons along with 40-50 miscreants armed with lathi, danda, bhala, garasa, gun etc., Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62416 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 came and the co-accused, Siri Yadav and Dinesh Yadav started firing towards the informant’s side. In the meantime, Mauzzam Ali Khan sustained gunshot injury due to which he died. On halla, villagers came there then the accused persons fled away. Further, when they went near the dead body of Mauzzam Ali Khan, one unknown person, expected to be the companion of the accused persons was lying dead. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The specific allegation of firing is against the co-accused persons, Siri Yadav and Dinesh Yadav. The other co-accused person has been granted anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 09.01.2015 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 29533/2014. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.07.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62416 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Sherghatti, Gaya in connection with S.Tr. No. 01/2025 / 272 of 2025 arising out of Raushanganj (Bankey Bazar) P.S. Case No. 18/1999 with the condition:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled. 7. The application stands allowed. atul/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T