Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11497 (AP)

DAYAM RAJEEV GANDHI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/8180/2022 · 2025-01-08

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010134032022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8180/2022 Between: 1. DAYAM RAJEEV GANDHI, S/O. SUBBA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O. 3-86, MUNIPALLI VILLAGE, NIDADAVOLE MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. DUSANAPUDI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O. 39-21-7/14, SRI LAKSHMI ENCLAVE, FNOG-1, SHANKAR NAGAR, WARD NO.39, MADHAVA DAM, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 3. THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, NARASAPURAM TOWN POLICE STATION, NARASAPURAM TOWN AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GANDHAM SR PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO.8180 OF 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent in threatening to file false case against petitioners and trying to arrest the petitioners in Crime No.187/2020 of Narasapuram Town Police Station and to pass…” 2. Sri Gandham SR Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 08.01.2025. Pmk 4 14 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:8180 of 2022 Date:08.01.2025 Pmk