RAJ KUMAR SAINI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/2865/2025 · 2025-01-30
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11495 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11495 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:14940 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2865 of 2025 Applicant :- Raj Kumar Saini And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Nigam,Rekha Singh,Satya Niwas Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Ashok Kumar Nigam, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with prayer to quash the order dated 11.12.2024 passed by Additional District Judge, Khurja, Bulandshahar in Criminal Revision No. 16 of 2024, whereby the revisional court affirmed the order dated 21.5.2024 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khurja, Bulandshahar in Case No. 1234 of 2023 (State vs. Raj Kumar Saini and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 116 of 2023, under sections 323, 353, 332 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Khurja City, District-Bulandshahar, whereby the learned Magistrate took cognizance under sections 323, 353, 332 and 506 I.P.C. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press the present application. In view of above, the present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copies of the relevant documents be returned to learned counsel for the applicants after retaining a photocopy of the same. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 Faridul Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad