Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 114934 (ALL)

RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH (IN FIR RAVI SINGH @ RAJEEV SINGH) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

/91/2025 · 2025-01-08

Om Prakash Shukla, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1216-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 91 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Singh (In Fir Ravi Singh @ Rajeev Singh) Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record. 2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 24.12.2024, bearing Case Crime No.0502 of 2024, for the offence under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 304(2), 352 & 351(3) B.N.S., registered at Police Station Inayat Nagar, District Ayodhya. 3. Learned A.G.A. on instructions states that during course of investigation Sections 109(1) and 304(2) B.N.S. have been dropped and now the only allegations against the petitioner are with regard to offences under Sections 115(2), 352 & 351(3) B.N.S. only. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after removal of Sections 109(1) and 304(2) B.N.S., rest of the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure (Now Bhartiya Nagrik Surksha Sanhita, 2023). 5. Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S., 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another. 6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S., 2023 and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). Order Date :- 8.1.2025 Arti/- [Om Prakash Shukla,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench