SUMANT SINGH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS
/103/2025 · 2025-01-08
Om Prakash Shukla, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114930 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114930 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1296-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 103 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sumant Singh Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Mani Tripathi,Anurag Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record.
2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 24.12.2024, bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No.0259 of 2024, for the offence under Sections 324(4), 324(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), and Sections 2 & 3 of Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984, registered at Police Station Tulsipur, District Balrampur.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in F.I.R. have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.
5. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said
facts.
6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). . [Om Prakash Shukla,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.]
Order Date :- 8.1.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench