Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 114929 (ALL)

KARISHMA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/34/2023 · 2025-09-10

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 34 of 2023 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Shri Dileep Kumar Pathak, the learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has already been released on bail and the anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. September 10, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dileep Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pt. Dadu Ram Shukla (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Karishma Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench