SRI RAJANALA VIJAYA SARADHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/7050/2025 · 2025-03-20
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11491 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11491 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sl.No.13 to 15
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No: WRIT PETITION No.7050 OF 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE
01. 15.10.2025 HN, J I.A. No.2 OF 2025
This interlocutory application is filed seeking condonation of a delay of 117 days in representing I.A. Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 which were filed for listing the matter and for amending the cause title of the 3rd respondent in the writ petition.
For the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the petition, the delay is condoned and accordingly, the I.A. is allowed. I.A. Nos.3 and 4 OF 2025
These interlocutory applications are filed seeking to list the writ petition under the caption “for being mentioned” and to amend the cause title of the 3rd respondent from “The Station House Officer, Chilakalapudi Police Station, Krishna District” to “The Station House Officer, Sarpavaram Police Station, Kakinada District.”
-2- 15.10.2025 (contn…)
W.P. No.7050 OF 2025 Sl.Nos.13 to 15
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while filing the writ petition, a typographical error in the cause title of the 3rd respondent was occurred i.e., the Station House Officer, Chilakalapudi Police Station, Krishna District, and it should correctly read as “the Station House Officer, Sarpavaram Police Station, Kakinada District.”
Considering the submissions made, I.A. Nos. 3 and 4 are allowed.
The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title of the 3rd respondent as prayed for. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N BV