HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 51 of 2025 Harsh Panwar ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Akshay Pradhan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.675 of 2024, under Sections 109(1), 351(2), 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25(1-B)(1) of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Manglour, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that it is a no injury case; chargesheet has already been filed in the case; the applicant is in custody for more than four months. 4. These facts are admitted by learned State Counsel. 2 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 10.01.2025 Ravi Bisht RAVI BISHT Digitally signed by RAVI BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=ded921477e34a304cbcb0b52d4a59f37e6 d2018d38d0b669a5c068799391e6bb, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AA64B1F44E60E652AE5485ED76496 1E4E52FD29C6F03C20917020ED093405536, cn=RAVI BISHT Date: 2025.01.10 01:27:57 +05'30'