179 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD SARDAR SINGH DECEASED TH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for the appellant Ms. Anita HARKESH MANUJA At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated 07.05.2025 passed by this Court in a bunch of appeals, which was RFA No. 79 of 2025, titled “ Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited Vs. Jai Narayan and Anr.” [2] On the other hand, learned in a position to controvert the above factual position. [3] After going through the judgment passed in case (supra) as well as the with the assertion of the learned counsel for the appell [4] Consequently, th terms as Jai Narayan’s case [6] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed off. 13.01.2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: ARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD Versus SARDAR SINGH DECEASED TH. LRS AND ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate with Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for the appellant Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate for the **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated 07.05.2025 passed by this Court in a bunch of appeals, which was RFA No. 79 of 2025, titled “Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited Vs. Jai Narayan On the other hand, learned counsel in a position to controvert the above factual position. After going through the judgment passed in (supra) as well as the facts of the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion of the learned counsel for the appell Consequently, the present appeal is disposed of Jai Narayan’s case (supra). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-98-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 13, 2026 ARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ........Appellant . LRS AND ORS. ......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate with Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for the appellant-HSIIDC. Advocate for the landowners. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated 07.05.2025 passed by this Court in a bunch of appeals, lead case of Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited Vs. Jai Narayan ounsel for the landowners is not in a position to controvert the above factual position. After going through the judgment passed in Jai Narayan’s present case, this Court agrees with the assertion of the learned counsel for the appellants. e present appeal is disposed of in the same Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) January 13, 2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated lead case of Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited Vs. Jai Narayan is not Jai Narayan’s present case, this Court agrees in the same Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.01.15 11:41 I agree to specified portions of this document