Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 114895 (ALL)

ARUN KUMAR SINGH PNO NO. 952463452 AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/180/2025 · 2025-01-13

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2176 Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 180 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Singh Pno No. 952463452 And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Singh Pawar,Nishtha Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Anand Singh Pawar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Sandeep Chandra, the learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. representing all the opposite parties. 2. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for issuance of a direction for grant of one additional increment after completing 19 years of service in compliance with the G.O. dated 02.12.2000. 3. The petitioners have submitted representation in this regard, copies whereof are annexed as annexure 4 to the writ petition. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his submission for issuance of a direction for disposal of the representation submitted by the petitioners. 5. The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid limited submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of by issuing a direction to the opposite party no. 3 to take appropriate decision on the petitioners representation, copies whereof are annexed as annexure 4 to the writ petition, expeditiously, in accordance with law. 7. It is clarified that this Court has not examined the merit of the petitioners' claim and left it open to be examined by the authority concerned. Order Date :- 13.1.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench