Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1458 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 126 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raju Singh Pno. 882810302 Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pushpendra Kumar Sharma,Gurucharan Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer from Police Station - Naya Gaon, District - Etah to Commissionerate, Kanpur Nagar, in pursuance of the circular dated 22.06.2017 issued by the Inspector General of Police (Establishment), Uttar Pradsesh Lucknow Head Quarter, Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow and also in pursuance of the guidelines for the session 2024-25 dated 11.06.2024. 3. It has been submitted that petitioner was initially appointed on the post of constable in Uttar Pradesh Police on 15.02.1988 and after serving at many places form time to time the petitioner is presently posted at Police Station - Naya Gaon, District - Etah and from the date of joining till date he is working with the entire satisfaction of the higher authorities. 4. He further submits that now the petitioner is about 58 years old and he and is to retire on 31.03.2026 as such only 15 months are left for his superannuation.It has also been submitted that wife of the petitioner Smt. Meena Kumari is suffering form Slipped Disc (herniated Disc). In this regard, it has been submitted that petitioner has given a representation dated 07.12.2024 to the respondent No. 2/Additional Director General of Police (Establishment), U.P., Lucknow which is pending consideration and has not been decided so far. 5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 2/Additional Director General of Police (Establishment), U.P., Lucknow is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 07.12.2024 in a time bound manner. 6. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2/Additional Director General of Police (Establishment), U.P., Lucknow to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 07.12.2024 (Annexure No. 4) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 8.1.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench