BHARAT GOSWAMI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND 3 OTHERS
/98/2025 · 2025-01-08
Om Prakash Shukla, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114890 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114890 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1264-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 98 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bharat Goswami Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Umesh Singh,Amarjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 13.11.2024, bearing Case Crime No.0343 of 2024, for the offence under Sections 61(2),318(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 60,63,72 U.P.Excise Act registered at Police Station Bakshi Ka Talab, District Lucknow.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,2023. shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.
Considering the stand of the investigating agency,
learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.)
Order Date :- 8.1.2025 Arjun/- Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench