ABHAY KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. SECOY. EDUCATION AND 3 OTHERS
/212/2025 · 2025-01-09
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114889 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114889 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1637 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 212 of 2025 Petitioner :- Abhay Kumar Pandey And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Secoy. Education And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he does not intend to press relief no.(i) and only confines his prayer for a direction being issued to respondent no.2 i.e. Director of Education (Secondary), Lucknow to decide the representation of the petitioners with regard to their grievances. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to prefer fresh individual representations within two weeks from today. In case such representations are preferred within stipulated time then the respondent no.2 shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a further period of four weeks from the date of preferring of the fresh representations along with certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 9.1.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench