Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 114878 (ALL)

RAMESH YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P THRU. ADDL. CHIEF PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND ANOTHER

/108/2025 · 2025-01-24

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4814 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 108 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramesh Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya),Sonal Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri R.K. Uyadhyay, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents and perused the material available on record. 2. The grievances of the petitioner is that he has been ignored for being promoted on the post of Assistant Consolidation Officer from the post of Consolidator on which the petitioners are working. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that the last and final seniority list was issued on 31.01.2022 wherein the claim of the petitioners are figured at Serial Nos. 516 and 517 while the persons at serial Nos. 520, 523, 524, 525, 527 and 530 have been promoted to the post of Assistant Consolidation Officer by means of order dated 19.12.2024. 4. He has submitted that there is no adverse material on the service records of the petitioners and also the criteria for promotion is seniority subject to rejection of unfit and accordingly submits that there is no reason as to why the claim of the petitioners could have been ignored. 5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners substantially redressed in case the respondent no. 2- Commissioner, Consolidation, U.P. Indira Bhawan, Ashok Marg, Lucknow is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 20.12.2024 moved by the petitioner in according with law within a stipulation period of time. 6. Learned Standing Counsel does not oppose the prayer made by the petitioners. 7. In light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 - Commissioner, Consolidation, U.P. Indira Bhawan, Ashok Marg, Lucknow to consider and decide the representation dated 20.12.2024 moved by the petitioner by a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously say within three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him and communicate the decision to the petitioners. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench